Monitoring, Modeling, and Memory

Dynamics of Data and Knowledge in Scientific Cyberinfrastructures

Archive for June, 2010

Big Science and Big Data in Biology

Posted by mattmayernik on June 28, 2010

I’ve come across an article that might be useful/interesting.

Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957-Present. E. Aronova, K.S. Baker, & N. Oreskes (2010). Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 40(2), 183-224.
http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/abs/10.1525/hsns.2010.40.2.183

It’s a historical study that traces how International Geophysical Year (IGY) led to the LTER program via the International Biological Program. The three MMM issues are all featured in various ways. It also might be particularly interesting to the forensic WATERS study, as it shows how the International Biological Program (IBP) program, which was a “failure” in some ways, fed directly into the creation of the highly successful LTER. Also, the IGY -> IBP transition that they discuss strikes me as paralleling the “observational envy” idea, though in this case it was “International Year” envy.

Highly recommended!

Posted in Reviews | Leave a Comment »

archiving experiments, WikiLeaks, and other data weirdness

Posted by Paul N. Edwards on June 21, 2010

“Archiving experiments” raises lots of questions about experimental data. It’s like the Earth System Curator idea that instead of archiving an actual dataset (simulation run), you can archive the model that produced it along with all the settings used to create that run.

Does the archived experiment work the same way, i.e. we get not only the output data, but also the possibility of reproducing the output data from the initial conditions of the experiment? What kinds of experiments can be “archived” in this way? Should be an interesting queston for CENS, since field experiments seem like one of the hardest to archive.

WikiLeaks: just read an interesting New Yorker piece on WikiLeaks – the paranoid leader of that outfit, an Aussie named Assange, is promoting a new standard of journalism in which you publish not only the story but recordings (video, audio) and docs on which the story was based. Fascinating.

I’ve had that thought about the future of historiography: not only would you publish your narrative/interpretation, but also you would provide links to all of the archival docs, interviews, etc. on which the history was based. This is nearly within reach now for contemporary history.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Upgrade to EndNote X4 and Relax…

Posted by archer on June 16, 2010

Another EndNote is coming!

Their feature about importing PDFs or folders of PDFs sounds right in line with one of our recommendations, although I don’t know if had it in the pipeline already. Group comparison also looks really nice, an obvious shortcoming in the previous versions.

It’s still not clear to me how easy or natural collaborative work with bibliographies is though.

I’ll plan to try out the trial.

Announcement link here

Posted in News | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Long-term Matters in Collaborative Development

Posted by archer on June 4, 2010

For the collaborative rhythm folks this should be very relevant, if you haven’t seen it already:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/f603078tj32n677u/

Karasti, H., K. Baker, et al. (2010). “Infrastructure Time: Long-term Matters in Collaborative Development.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

This paper addresses the collaborative development of information infrastructure for supporting data-rich scientific collaboration. Studying infrastructure development empirically not only in terms of spatial issues but also, and equally importantly, temporal ones, we illustrate how the long-term matters. Our case is about the collaborative development of a metadata standard for an ecological research domain. It is a complex example where standards are recognized as one element of infrastructure and standard-making efforts include integration of semantic work and software tools development. With a focus on the temporal scales of short-term and long-term, we analyze the practices and views of the main parties involved in the development of the standard. Our contributions are three-fold: 1) extension of the notion of infrastructure to more explicitly include the temporal dimension; 2) identification of two distinct temporal orientations in information infrastructure development work, namely ‘project time’ and ‘infrastructure time’, and 3) association of related development orientations, particularly ‘continuing design’ as a  development orientation that recognizes ‘infrastructure time’. We conclude by highlighting the need to enrich understandings of temporality in CSCW, particularly towards longer time scales and more diversified temporal hybrids in collaborative infrastructure development. This work draws attention to the manifold ramifications that ‘infrastructure time’, as an example of more extended temporal scales, suggests for CSCW and e-Research infrastructures.

Posted in News | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.